Virtualni stroj odličan je način za korištenje različitih operativnih sustava, poput Windowsa^(Windows) , Linuxa^(Linux) ili macOS-a, bez kupnje drugog računala. Ali što je najbolje: VMWare ili VirtualBox ?

Što rade VirtualBox i VMWare?

VMWare i VirtualBox su rješenja za virtualizaciju stroja, također poznata kao hipervizori. Omogućuju vam pokretanje potpunog virtualnog računala s vlastitim operativnim sustavom u virtualiziranom stroju na drugom računalu.

Ali zašto biste to htjeli učiniti?

Za korisnika stolnog računala, recimo da koristite Windows, ali biste također željeli koristiti Linux , macOS ili čak iOS i Android . Ipak, nemate računala za sve njih. Tu ćete koristiti rješenje za virtualizaciju radne površine.

Možete čak pokrenuti prethodnu verziju sustava Windows unutar VM-a na vašem sustavu Windows 11^{(Windows 11)} ako imate starije aplikacije koje jednostavno ne rade dobro s novijim sustavima.

U poslovanju virtualizacija poslužitelja štedi na hardverskim i operativnim troškovima. Zamislite^(Imagine) da imate samo nekoliko fizičkih računala, ali na njima možete imati mnogo poslužitelja i radnih stanica.

Koje su vrste hipervizora?

Hipervizor ima više od toga da samo omogućuje pokretanje virtualnog računala unutar fizičkog računala. Važno je kako to rade, a svaka vrsta ima različite zahtjeve i zadovoljava različite potrebe. Postoje dvije vrste hipervizora; Tip 1^{(Type 1)} i Tip 2^{(Type 2)} .

Hipervizori tipa 1 ponekad se nazivaju bare-metal hipervizori, što znači da ne moraju raditi unutar uobičajenog operativnog sustava kao što je Hyper-V u sustavu Windows^(Windows) . Oni su operativni sustav. Bez svih značajki standardnog operativnog sustava, ostavit će više resursa za svoje gostujuće virtualne mašine. To ih čini idealnima za velike podatkovne centre ili srednje do velike tvrtke. Tvrtka VMWare ima hipervizor tipa 1 kao što su ESXi ( Elastic Sky X Integrated ) i VSphere .

Hipervizori tipa 2^{(Type 2)} rade unutar običnog operativnog sustava kao da su samo još jedan program. Da bi to učinili, hipervizori tipa 2^{(Type 2)} moraju pristupiti hardverskim resursima putem OS-a glavnog računala. Zbog toga, hipervizori tipa 2^{(Type 2)} nisu tako učinkoviti kao tip 1^{(Type 1)} za hosting velikih količina gostujućih VM^(VMs) -ova . Hipervizori tipa 2^{(Type 2)} prikladniji su za pojedince i mala i srednja poduzeća.

VirtualBox je hipervizor tipa 2 za Windows , macOS i Linux . VMWare također nudi VMWare Fusion za macOS i VMWare Workstation za Windows i Linux .

Usporedba VirtualBox i VMWare tipa 2^{(VMWare Type 2)} hipervizora

U ovom članku fokusiramo se na hipervizor tipa 2^{(Type 2)} budući da će to koristiti većina kućnih ili malih poslovnih korisnika. A mi ćemo usporediti dvije ponude u istom okruženju—pokretanje Linuxa^(Linux) na Microsoft Windows 11 .

Konkretno, usporedit ćemo VMWare Workstation Player s Oracleovim VirtualBoxom^(VirtualBox) . VMWare Workstation Player je besplatna verzija za osobnu upotrebu, a VirtualBox je besplatan za širu javnost i otvorenog koda. Ako vam se sviđa VMWare Workstation Player i želite više značajki, isprobajte pristupačni VMWare Workstation Pro za komercijalnu upotrebu.

Usporedba funkcionalnosti VMWare Playera^{(VMWare Player)} i VirtualBoxa^{(VirtualBox Functionality Comparison)}

Sljedeća tablica prikazuje ključne značajke koje nude VMWare Player i VirtualBox .

VirtualBox, VMWare i Snapshots

Možda je najznačajnija razlika u tome što VirtualBox podržava VM snimke dok VMWare Player ne podržava. Izrada snimke u VMWare Playeru^{(VMWare Player)} zahtijeva pronalaženje datoteka VM-a, zatim njihovo kopiranje i lijepljenje na drugo mjesto. Za vraćanje na tu točku u vremenu, snimka se dodaje kao novi VM.

VirtualBox ima nekoliko načina za snimanje snimke. To se može učiniti unutar prozora za goste ili VirtualBox upravitelja. Snimke se mogu imenovati, a VirtualBox ih organizira kronološki. Vraćanje na prethodno vrijeme jednostavno zahtijeva odabir željene snimke, odabir Vrati^(Restore) , zatim pokretanje VM-a. VirtualBox je očiti pobjednik što se tiče snimaka.

Što je lakše koristiti, VirtualBox ili VMWare Workstation Player ?

Preuzimanje i instaliranje VirtualBoxa^(VirtualBox) ili VMWarea^(VMWare) jednostavno je kao i bilo koji drugi softver. Svaki ima instalatere koji vas vode kroz proces. Razlike se pojavljuju kada se instalira gostujući OS.

VirtualBox zahtijeva ručne odabire resursa poput memorije, diskovnog prostora i broja procesorskih jezgri, dok VMWare Player uspoređuje resurse vašeg glavnog računala s onima koje zahtijeva gostujući OS i automatski dodjeljuje resurse, čineći ga jednostavnim za korištenje. Nakon što je gostujući OS instaliran, možete prilagoditi resurse dodijeljene u oba hipervizora.

Vrijeme za instalaciju hipervizora i Linux Ubuntu na Windows^{(Linux Ubuntu on Windows)} pokazuje da je VMWare oko 30% brže. VirtualBoxu^(VirtualBox) je trebalo 25 minuta, dok je VMWare Playeru^{(VMWare Player)} trebalo 17 minuta.

Što radi bolje^{(Runs Better)} , VirtualBox ili VMWare Workstation Player ?

Oba hipervizora su tipa 2^{(Type 2)} , rade na vrhu sustava Windows , tako da ne očekujte značajnu razliku u performansama. Koristeći PassMark PerformanceTest , VMWare Player je pokazao CPU oznaku^{(CPU Mark)} od 4935 naspram VirtualBoxovih 3465. To je bila najveća razlika. Ostali markeri bili su blizu, no činilo se da je VMWare brži. Naravno, host strojevi se razlikuju, a tako će se razlikovati i vaše iskustvo.

Što je bolje^(Better) , VMWare Workstation Player ili VirtualBox ?

Ne znamo točno što tražite u hipervizoru. VMWare Workstation Player i VirtualBox rade gotovo istu stvar s manjim razlikama, tako da nema jasnog pobjednika. Sve ovisi o slučajevima korištenja.

VMWare Workstation Player najbolji je ako samo trebate brzo pokrenuti virtualni stroj. Ako trebate koristiti aplikacije u drugom OS-u ili procjenjujete različite operativne sustave, vi ste u toj skupini.

Ako se želite osloniti na finese upravljanja hipervizorom i njegovim gostima, VirtualBox je za vas. Lakoća stvaranja snimaka i njihovog obnavljanja prevagnula je vagu. Još jedna stvar za VirtualBox je da možete instalirati macOS u VirtualBox^{(install macOS in VirtualBox)} s nekim smjernicama. VirtualBox bi mogao biti bolji za ljude koji uče DevOps , administratore sustava ili stručnjake za kibernetičku sigurnost koji testiraju različite operativne sustave^(OSes) .

Koji^{(Which one)} ćete koristiti ili već imate favorita? Imate li kakve savjete ili trikove za podijeliti? Javite^(Please) nam u komentarima.

VirtualBox vs VMWare: Which Is Best?

A virtual machine iѕ a great waу to use dіfferent operating systеms, likе Windows, Linux, or macOS, withoυt buying another computer. But which is best: VMWare or VirtualBox?

What Do VirtualBox and VMWare Do?

VMWare and VirtualBox are machine virtualization solutions, also known as hypervisors. They let you run a full virtual computer with its own operating system in a virtualized machine on another computer.

But why would you want to do that?

For the desktop user, say you use Windows, but you’d also like to use Linux, macOS, or even iOS and Android. Yet you don’t have computers for all of them. That’s where you’ll use a desktop virtualization solution.

You could even run a previous version of Windows inside a VM on your Windows 11 system if you have older apps that just don’t run well with newer systems.

In a business, server virtualization saves on hardware and operational costs. Imagine having just a few physical computers yet being able to have many servers and workstations hosted on them.

What Are the Types of Hypervisors?

There’s more to hypervisors than just allowing you to run a virtual computer inside a physical computer. How they do it is important, and each type has different requirements and satisfies different needs. There are two types of hypervisors; Type 1 and Type 2.

Type 1 hypervisors are sometimes called bare-metal hypervisors, meaning they don’t need to run inside a regular operating system like Hyper-V in Windows. They are the operating system. Without all the features of a standard operating system, they’ll leave more resources for their guest VMs. This makes them ideal for large data centers or medium to large businesses. The VMWare company has Type 1 hypervisors such as ESXi (Elastic Sky X Integrated) and VSphere.

Type 2 hypervisors run within a regular operating system as though they’re just another program. To do that, Type 2 hypervisors must access hardware resources through the host OS. Because of that, Type 2 hypervisors aren’t as efficient as Type 1 for hosting large amounts of guest VMs. Type 2 hypervisors are better suited for individuals and small to medium businesses.

VirtualBox is a Type 2 hypervisor for Windows, macOS, and Linux. VMWare also offers VMWare Fusion for macOS and VMWare Workstation for Windows and Linux.

Comparing VirtualBox and VMWare Type 2 Hypervisors

In this article, we’re focusing on Type 2 hypervisors since that’s what most home or small business users will be running. And we will compare the two offerings in the same environment—running Linux on Microsoft Windows 11.

Specifically, we’ll compare VMWare Workstation Player to Oracle’s VirtualBox. VMWare Workstation Player is the free version for personal use, and VirtualBox is free for the general public and open-source. If you like VMWare Workstation Player and want more features, try the affordable VMWare Workstation Pro for commercial use.

VMWare Player and VirtualBox Functionality Comparison

The following table shows the key features offered by VMWare Player and VirtualBox.

VirtualBox, VMWare, and Snapshots

Perhaps the most significant difference is that VirtualBox supports VM snapshots while VMWare Player doesn’t. Making a snapshot in the VMWare Player requires finding the VM’s files, then copying and pasting them to another location. To roll back to that point in time, the snapshot is added as a new VM.

VirtualBox has several ways to take a snapshot. It can be done from within the guest window or the VirtualBox manager. Snapshots can be named, and VirtualBox organizes them chronologically. Rolling back to a previous time simply requires selecting the desired snapshot, selecting Restore, then starting the VM. VirtualBox is the clear winner regarding snapshots.

Which is Easier to Use, VirtualBox or VMWare Workstation Player?

Downloading and installing either VirtualBox or VMWare is as simple as any other software. Each has installers that walk you through the process. The differences appear when installing a guest OS.

VirtualBox requires making some manual choices about resources like memory, drive space, and the number of processor cores, whereas VMWare Player compares your host computer’s resources to those required by the guest OS and automatically assigns resources, making it user-friendly. After the guest OS is installed, you can adjust the resources assigned in both hypervisors.

The time to install the hypervisors and Linux Ubuntu on Windows shows VMWare is about 30% quicker. VirtualBox took 25 minutes, while VMWare Player took 17 minutes.

Which Runs Better, VirtualBox or VMWare Workstation Player?

Both hypervisors are Type 2, running on top of Windows, so don’t expect a significant performance difference. Using PassMark PerformanceTest, VMWare Player showed a CPU Mark of 4935 versus VirtualBox’s 3465. That was the biggest difference. The rest of the markers were close, yet it felt like VMWare was faster. Of course, host machines vary, and so will your experience.

Which is Better, VMWare Workstation Player or VirtualBox?

We don’t know exactly what you’re looking for in a hypervisor. VMWare Workstation Player and VirtualBox do virtually the same thing with minor differences, so there’s no clear winner. It all depends on the use cases.

VMWare Workstation Player is best if you just need to get a virtual machine running quickly. If you need to use apps in a different OS or you’re evaluating a variety of operating systems, you’re in that group.

If you want to lean into the finer points of managing a hypervisor and its guests, VirtualBox is for you. The ease of creating snapshots and restoring them tips the scales. Another point for VirtualBox is that you can install macOS in VirtualBox with some direction. VirtualBox may be better for people learning DevOps, system administrators, or cybersecurity professionals testing different OSes.

Which one will you use, or do you already have a favorite? Do you have any tips or tricks to share? Please let us know in the comments.

Related posts

• 6 najboljih Reddit alternativa koje možete koristiti besplatno

• The 6 Best Online Paraphrasing Tools to Rewrite Text

• 7 najboljih aplikacija i web-mjesta za gledanje videa zajedno

• 4 najbolje aplikacije za daljinski pregled web kamere na iOS-u i Androidu

• Najbolji fitness bendovi ispod 2500 Rs u Indiji

• 5 najboljih aplikacija Cash Advance za iPhone i Android

• Apple novčanik u odnosu na Google Pay – što je najbolje?

• 18 najboljih alata za hakiranje 2022

• 7 najboljih aplikacija koje će vam pomoći da bolje učite

• 10 najboljih Evernote predložaka

• Najbolji alati za kopiranje velikog broja datoteka u sustavu Windows

• 20 najboljih aplikacija za praćenje mobitela 2022

• 7 najboljih Slack robota za vaš Slack kanal

• Top 10 najboljih torrent web stranica 2022

• 5 najboljih video konvertera za Android

• Najbolji besplatni program za karaoke za Windows

• 6 najboljih besplatnih Android aplikacija za prestanak pušenja

• Najbolji softver za roditeljsku kontrolu za Windows 10

• 10 najboljih Discord botova koje bi svaki vlasnik poslužitelja trebao isprobati

• 6 najboljih aplikacija za trudnoću u 2021