Konačna borba za procesore^(CPU) – AMD Ryzen 9 3900X protiv Intel Core i9-9900K. Obje su najbolja ponuda sa svake strane CPU rata, ali koja je na vrhu? Duboko ću zaroniti i otkriti koji je CPU uistinu bolji.

Dugo se vremena i9-9900K smatrao najboljim dostupnim računalom za igre – bio je najbolji izbor za igrače, streamere i kreatore sadržaja bez ograničenog budžeta. Ali onda je u srpnju 2019. ^{(July 2019)}AMD šokirao svijet svojim visokim specifikacijama, konkurentnom cijenom Ryzen 9^{(Ryzen 9)} 3900X.

Oba CPU-^(CPUs) a imaju vrlo slične cijene, a oba nude najbolje što svaki proizvođač CPU -a može dati igračima u 2019. Ovdje postoji veliko rivalstvo, pa pogledajmo kako se svaki od njih ponaša u najboljim svjetskim video igrama.

Koji je CPU bolji^(Better) za igranje^(Gaming) ? Ryzen 3900X protiv Intela^(Intel) i9-9900K 

Objedinit ću podatke iz brojnih izvora koji su testirali Ryzen 3900X i Intel i9-9900K. Počevši od Techspotove^(Techspot) recenzije , možemo vidjeti da performanse temeljene na igranju pri 1080p rezoluciji čini i9-9900K oko 2-10% bržim u prosječnim okvirima od igre do igre. Najznačajniji^(Highlights) su prosjek od 157 fps od 9900K u odnosu na prosjek od 140 fps od 3900X u Apex Legends . 

Fortnite je pokazao 252 fps na dionici i9-9900K i 238 fps na dionici AMD Ryzen 9^{(AMD Ryzen 9)} 3900X. S overclockanim rezultatima bila je ista priča s pobjedom i9-9900K, iako su oba mogla iscijediti samo nekoliko dodatnih okvira u odnosu na svoje standardne performanse.

Još jedna recenzija Hardware Unboxed -a pokazala je da je osim čudnog povećanja performansi Ryzena 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} od 1-3% u CS:GO, Monster Hunter World i Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, svaka druga igra pokazala bolje performanse i9-9900K. 

Najveći rezultat bio je u Starcraft II-ovom 4v4 načinu rada s 16% razlike u izvedbi u korist 9900K. Druge igre kao što su PUBG^(PUBG) , Fortnite , Apex Legends , Resident Evil 2 , Battlefront II i Battlefield V doživjele su poboljšanja na putu od 9900K. Rezultat Linus Tech Tips-^{(Linus Tech Tips’ score)} a također je pokazao bolje rezultate u CS:GO-u s Ryzenom 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} , ali u svakoj drugoj igri i9-9900K je zauzeo prvo mjesto.

U konačnici, razlika u brzini kadrova nije velika, ali je dovoljna da se spomene. Međutim, treba uzeti u obzir jednu stvar koja daje veću zaslugu i9-9900K – cijena. U Velikoj Britaniji, Intel je konkurentno spustio cijenu 9900K na 490 funti kako bi snizio cijenu Ryzena 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} od 529,99 funti^(£529.99) .

U SAD-u i9-9900K ima cijenu od 479 dolara, ali Ryzen 3900X se^{(Ryzen 3900X)} prodaje za 499 dolara. To je ako se možete dočepati jednog – nestašice su bile prilično velike, što je kupnju vrhunskog AMD čipseta po maloprodajnoj cijeni učinilo malo izazovnijim.

Dakle, ako i9-9900K nadmašuje Ryzen 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} u igračkim performansama i cijenama, zašto ljudi još uvijek kupuju AMD čip?

Razlozi za kupnju Ryzena 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} umjesto i9-9900K

AMD je bio blizu da nadmaši performanse i9-9900K u igrama, ali to im nije baš uspjelo. Više sreće sljedeće generacije, AMD . Međutim, o Ryzenu 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} treba uzeti u obzir nešto važno .

Uzimajući AM4 čipset, provjeravate svoju verziju u budućnosti. Budući AMD čipovi će vjerojatno koristiti AM4 , ali je potvrđeno da će Intelov sljedeći čipset zahtijevati drugu matičnu ploču. Dobre matične ploče nisu jeftine, pa je to za mnoge ljude.

Ako ste kreativac, pročitajte ovo. Samo naprijed dolazi 12-jezgreni AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. Puget Systemsovi^(Systems) testovi su pokazali da AMD 3900X nadmašuje^{(AMD 3900X)} sve ostale čipsetove u Photoshopu^(Photoshop) , a 3900X nadmašuje 9900K u Premiere Pro izvedbi^{(Premiere Pro performance)} .

Međutim, i9-9900K se vraća i pobjeđuje Ryzen čip u After Effects . Za druge zadatke, možda je Ryzen 3900X bolji izbor. Na primjer, AMD Ryzen 3900X je pobijedio i9-9900K u zadacima poput ekstrahiranja zip datoteka i renderiranja Blender demo datoteka zahvaljujući 12 jezgri.

Također, 3900X podržava PCI 4.0 , tako da ako si možete priuštiti kompatibilnu matičnu ploču, možete očekivati ​​veće NVME brzine i, dobro, to je za sada to. Ali to je sjajna tehnologija na koju će se cijeli računalni svijet na kraju nadograditi radi poboljšane propusnosti podataka i performansi.

AMD 3900X je također energetski učinkovitiji, što je odlično za uštedu energije, male konstrukcije ili za tiše hlađenje.

Što to znači? U konačnici, ako želite u budućnosti provjeriti svoj sustav i koristiti aplikacije koje imaju koristi od više jezgri, cijenit ćete Ryzen 3900X . Međutim, ako sada želite uštedjeti novac ili želite bolje performanse igranja, i9-9900K je vjerojatno najbolji izbor.

Sažetak

Hvala što ste pročitali moj pregled dva najbolja CPU-^(CPUs) a za igranje u 2019. Imate li još pitanja o tome kako se i9-9900K slaže s Ryzenom 3900X^{(Ryzen 3900X)} ? Slobodno^(Feel) mi se obratite putem društvenih mreža i možemo razgovarati. 

Ryzen 3900X vs Intel i9-9900K – Which CPU Is Truly Better?

The ultіmate CPU battle – the ΑMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs the Intel Core i9-9900K. Both are the best offering from each side of the CPU war, but which one сomes out on top? I will dive deep and find out which CPU iѕ truly better.

For a long time the i9-9900K was considered the best gaming PC available – it was the top choice for gamers, streamers, and content creators without a limited budget. But then in July 2019, AMD shocked the world with their high spec, competitively priced Ryzen 9 3900X.

Both CPUs are very similarly priced, and both offer the best each CPU manufacturer can possibly give to gamers in 2019. There’s a big rivalry here, so let’s take a look at how each perform in the world’s top video games.

Which CPU is Better for Gaming? Ryzen 3900X vs Intel i9-9900K 

I will be aggregating data from a number of sources that have tested the Ryzen 3900X and the Intel i9-9900K. Starting with a review by Techspot, we can see that performance based on gaming at 1080p resolution puts the i9-9900K about 2-10% faster in average frames from game to game. Highlights include a 157 fps average from the 9900K stock versus a 140 fps average from the 3900X in Apex Legends. 

Fortnite showed 252 fps on the i9-9900K stock and 238 fps on the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X stock. With overclocked results it was the same story with the i9-9900K winning, even though both could only squeeze out an extra few frames over their stock performance.

Another review by Hardware Unboxed showcased that besides the Ryzen 3900X’s strange 1-3% performance increase in CS:GO, Monster Hunter World, and Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation, every other game saw the i9-9900K performing better. 

The highest score was in Starcraft II’s 4v4 mode with a 16% performance difference in the 9900K’s favor. Other games like PUBG, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2, Battlefront II, and Battlefield V saw improvements going the 9900K’s way. Linus Tech Tips’ score also saw CS:GO performing higher with the Ryzen 3900X, but every other game had the i9-9900K taking first place.

Ultimately, the difference in frame rate isn’t massive, but it’s enough to warrant a mention. However, there is one thing to consider that gives the i9-9900K more credit – pricing. In the UK, Intel has competitively dropped the 9900K’s price to £490 to undercut the Ryzen 3900X’s £529.99 price tag.

In the US, the i9-9900K is priced at $479, but the Ryzen 3900X sells for $499. That’s if you can get your hands on one – the shortages have been pretty bad, which has made purchasing a top tier AMD chipset for retail price a little more challenging.

So, if the i9-9900K beats out the Ryzen 3900X in gaming performance and pricing, why are people still buying the AMD chip?

Reasons to Buy the Ryzen 3900X Instead of the i9-9900K

AMD was close to beating the i9-9900K’s performance in gaming, but they didn’t quite accomplish it. Better luck next generation, AMD. However, there’s something important to consider about the Ryzen 3900X.

By taking the AM4 chipset, you are future proofing your build. Future AMD chips are likely to use AM4, but it has been confirmed that Intel’s next chipset will require a different motherboard. Good motherboard’s aren’t cheap, so that’s a consideration for many people.

If you are a creative, take a read of this. The 12 core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X comes out ahead, just. Puget Systems’ tests have shown the AMD 3900X beats all other chipsets in Photoshop, and the 3900X beats the 9900K in Premiere Pro performance.

However, the i9-9900K comes back and beats the Ryzen chip in After Effects. For other tasks, perhaps the Ryzen 3900X is a better choice. For example, the AMD Ryzen 3900X beat the i9-9900K in tasks like extracting zip files, and rendering Blender demo files thanks to the 12 cores.

Also, the 3900X supports PCI 4.0, so if you can afford a compatible motherboard, you can expect faster NVME speeds and, well, that’s about it for now. But it’s some awesome tech that the whole computing world will upgrade to eventually for improved data bandwidth and performance.

The AMD 3900X is also more energy efficient, which is great for power saving, small builds, or for running quieter cooling.

So what does this mean? Ultimately if you want to future proof your system and use apps that benefit from more cores, you’ll appreciate the Ryzen 3900X. However, if you want to save money now, or want better gaming performance, the i9-9900K is arguably the best choice.

Summary

Thanks for reading my overview of the two best gaming CPUs in 2019. Have any more questions about how the i9-9900K stacks up against the Ryzen 3900X? Feel free to reach out to me over social media and we can discuss. 

Related posts

• Usporedba CPU procesora – Intel Core i9 vs i7 vs i5 vs i3

• ASUS Transformer Book T300 Chi recenzija - dobar izgled upoznajte Intel Core M CPU

• Intel Core i5-12600K recenzija: Najbolji ovogodišnji gaming CPU srednjeg ranga?

• Koja je najbolja matična ploča za vaš AMD Ryzen CPU?

• Najbolji proračunski procesori za igre u 2019. u usporedbi – Intel vs Ryzen za niske verzije

• Spotify u odnosu na Apple Music – uspoređena cijena, kvaliteta i privatnost

• ADATA XPG Lancer DDR5-5200 RAM recenzija: Izvrsno za Intel 12. Gen!

• Quicktime vs VLC vs Plex – koji je najbolji media player?

• ARM protiv Intelovih procesora: koji je najbolji?

• Usporedba performansi: Korištenje AMD Ryzen 5 3600X na matičnim pločama X570 u odnosu na X470

• Google Tasks u odnosu na Google Keep: što je bolje?

• Recenzija AMD Ryzen 3 3100: Redefiniranje proračuna

• Recenzija procesora AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: najbolji izbor srednje klase za 2019.!

• Firewalla Gold recenzija – Firewall Router za osiguranje vašeg doma

• Zapier vs IFTTT: Što je bolje za automatizaciju u oblaku?

• Recenzija AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: Novi kralj proračunskih igara!

• Intel Core 12th Gen i7-12700K recenzija: Povratak u igru!

• Miš vs. Trackpad – koji vas čini produktivnijim?

• Skinny na AMD Ryzen 3000

• Android Auto u odnosu na CarPlay: u čemu se razlikuju i što je bolje?