AMD Ryzen 3 3100 najisplativiji je stolni procesor iz obitelji Ryzen 3000 . Cijena mu je ispod 100 dolara, ima neke iznenađujuće specifikacije i podržava tehnologije koje su otporne na budućnost poput PCI Express verzije 4. Tijekom testiranja primijetili smo da ponekad nadmašuje neke od skupljih procesora iz obitelji Intel Core i5. Ako ste znatiželjni saznati više, pročitajte ovu recenziju i saznajte više o tome što vam ovih dana može donijeti manje od sto dolara:

AMD Ryzen 3 3100: Kome je dobar?

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 izvrstan je procesor za one od vas koji žele:

• Za izradu proračunskog stolnog računala
• Dobre performanse u aplikacijama za produktivnost
• Za cilj imati energetski učinkovito računalo

Pogledajte cijenu na:

Buy now

Za i protiv

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 ima sljedeće prednosti:

• Niska cijena
• Osnovna frekvencija i taktovi pojačanja su izvrsni
• Brz^(Fast) u produktivnim aplikacijama i pregledavanju weba
• Dovoljno dobre performanse za početne igre
• Niska potrošnja energije i temperatura
• Podrška za brze PCIe 4.0 komponente kao što su SSD-ovi^(SSDs)
• Zen 2 arhitektura znači da ga možete upariti s brzim DDR4
• Otključan je, pa bi overclocking mogao biti nešto što vrijedi pogledati

Ima i nekih nedostataka:

• Malo je slabiji ako želite pokrenuti igre visoke kvalitete
• Za samo 20 USD više, možete dobiti AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, koji je još bolji desktop procesor

Presuda

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 izvrstan je izbor ako je ono što tražite dobre performanse uz ograničeni budžet. Iako košta manje od 100 dolara, nije ništa drugo do impresivan u mjerilima, zadacima produktivnosti i igranju početnih razina. Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3100 trebao bi nadmašiti sve prethodne generacije Intel Core i3 procesora. U nekim mjerilima uspijeva nadmašiti čak i Intel Core i5-8400 koji se prodaje po znatno višoj cijeni. Međutim, ako vam ne smeta platiti 20 dolara više, Ryzen 3 3300X je još bolji izbor koji donosi značajno pojačanje, posebno u igrama.

Specifikacije hardvera

Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3100 je procesor s najosnovnijim procesorom iz AMD -ove serije 3000 procesora, ali to ne znači da nije prepun dobrota. Prije^(First) svega, napravljen je koristeći istu Zen 2 arhitekturu kao AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, Ryzen 5 3600 ili Ryzen 7 3700X i isti 7-nanometarski proizvodni proces. Što je još važnije, podržava PCI Express 4.0 . Ako želite znati zašto je to važno, pročitajte: PCI Express 4 protiv PCIe 3: Ima li poboljšanja performansi?^{(PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Is there a performance improvement?)}

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 ima četiri fizičke jezgre i osam niti, koji rade na osnovnoj frekvenciji od 3,6 GHz . Može doseći takt pojačanja od 3,9 GHz na jednoj niti. AMD je ovaj procesor opremio s ukupnom cache memorijom od 18 MB, od čega je 16 MB cache razine 3^{(Level 3)} . Također, koristi AM4 socket, što ga čini kompatibilnim s novim matičnim pločama B550 čipseta koje dolaze s PCIe 4 i nižom cijenom od onih koje se temelje na postojećem X570 čipsetu. Također je kompatibilan s AMD -ovim PCIe 3 čipsetima koji se nalaze na B450 , X470 iX370 matične ploče.

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 podržava brzi DDR4 RAM koji radi na 3200 MHz , ali također možete koristiti DIMM^(DIMMs) -ove s još bržim taktovima. Iako TDP nije mjera za potrošnju energije, može se koristiti za brzi uvid u to koliko električne energije procesoru treba u normalnoj upotrebi. S tim u vezi, TDP Ryzen ^(TDP)3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3100 je samo 65 W^(Watts) , tako da bi trebao biti izvrstan izbor ako želite izgraditi energetski učinkovito računalo.

S nešto manje od 100 USD, Ryzen 3 3100 dolazi s impresivnim specifikacijama na kojima mu Intel vjerojatno zavidi. Ovaj početni procesor nudi vam četiri jezgre, osam niti i podršku za PCIe 4. Ovo je više nego što smo očekivali za tako nisku cijenu.^{(At just under 100 USD, the Ryzen 3 3100 comes with impressive specifications that probably make Intel envious. This entry-level processor gives you four cores, eight threads, and PCIe 4 support. This is more than we would have expected for such a low price.)}

Performanse u mjerilima i igrama

Testirali smo procesor AMD Ryzen 3^{(AMD Ryzen 3)} 3100 na osobnom računalu sa sljedećim hardverom i softverom:

• Matična ploča: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
• Memorija: HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB memorija^{(HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB Memory)} (2 x 8 GB, 3200 MHz)
• Grafička kartica: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1660 Ti GAMING OC
• Pohrana: ADATA XPG Gammix S11 Pro SSD
• Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ zakrivljeni gaming monitor^{(ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ Curved Gaming Monitor)} (32-inčni WQHD 2560 x 1440, 144Hz)
• Napajanje: ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• Operativni sustav: Windows 10 Pro x64 s ažuriranjem iz studenog 2019^{( November 2019 Update)}

Da bismo bolje razumjeli koliko je brz i pouzdan procesor AMD Ryzen 3^{(AMD Ryzen 3)} 3100, izvršili smo niz mjerila. Zatim smo usporedili njegove rezultate s onima koje smo dobili s drugim CPU-ima: Ryzen 3 3300X (njegov brži brat s četiri jezgre) i Ryzen 5 3600 (najpovoljniji 6-jezgreni CPU serije AMD 3000 ).

Počeli smo s CPU-Z^(CPU-Z's) testom Single Thread . Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3100 osvojio je 458 bodova, što je izvrstan rezultat (6,5% manje od 3300X i 2,5% manje od Ryzena 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600). Prema ljestvici CPU-Z-a^{(CPU-Z's rankings)} , Ryzen 3 3100 je brži od 6-jezgrenog Intel Core i5-8400, koji se prodaje po gotovo dvostrukoj cijeni.

U Multi-Thread testu Ryzen 3 3100 postigao je 2535 bodova. Nešto je sporiji od Ryzena 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X (za 6,1%), a znatno manje stručan od Ryzena 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600 (za 30,1%). Ipak, radi isto kao i Intel Core i5-8400 (stolni CPU s dvije jezgre više i gotovo dvostruko cijenom).

U Cinebench R20 , višenitnom testu renderiranja, AMD Ryzen 3 3100 dobio je 2169 bodova. Nešto je sporiji od 3300X (7,9%) i znatno manje moćan od 6-jezgrenog Ryzena 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600 (32,7% sporiji).

U Blender Benchmarku^{(Blender Benchmark)} renderirali smo bmw27 i scene iz učionice . ^(classroom)Ova referentna vrijednost broji vrijeme generiranja. Što manje vremena treba, to bolje. I ovdje je AMD Ryzen 3 3100 osjetno sporiji od ostalih CPU-^(CPUs) a na našem popisu, čak i u usporedbi s Ryzen 3 3300X (11% slabiji od 3300X i 15,6% sporiji od Ryzena 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600).

Također smo koristili 7-Zip za mjerenje performansi s više niti. AMD Ryzen 3 3100 uspio je postići brzinu od 26 MB/s u mjerilu kompresije, što je malo (10,3%) manje od onoga što može napraviti Ryzen 3 3300X. U usporedbi s Ryzen 5 3600 razlika u brzini je značajna (35%).

Što se tiče brzine dekompresije, Ryzen 3 3100 nije toliko zaostajao za Ryzen 3 3300X. Ipak, dvije dodatne jezgre na Ryzenu 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600 pokazuju svoju snagu.

Za testiranje procesora u tipičnim svakodnevnim aktivnostima, kao što su pregledavanje weba, video konferencije, vrijeme pokretanja aplikacija, produktivnost i stvaranje digitalnog sadržaja, koristili smo PCMark 10, a Ryzen 3 3100 nije razočarao. Iako ima dvije jezgre manje, pokazao se gotovo jednako brzim kao Ryzen 5 3600 (razlika u rezultatu samo 1,4%). U usporedbi s Ryzen 3 3300X, dobio je nešto niži rezultat (5,8% niži rezultat), ali hej, četverojezgreni 3300X imao je neočekivano visok rezultat u PCMarku 10^{(PCMark 10)} .

Da bismo izmjerili performanse ovog procesora prilikom pregledavanja weba, koristili smo JetStream 2 benchmark u Google Chromeu^{(Google Chrome)} . AMD Ryzen 3 3100 dobio je dobru ocjenu, iako ne može parirati Ryzenu 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X (10,8% bolji) ili Ryzenu 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600 (8,8% bolji).

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 vjerojatno nije procesor koji razmišljate ako ste igrač. Međutim, neki ljudi bi mogli htjeti napraviti proračunsko računalo, a ne možete dobiti nižu cijenu za AMD Zen 2 desktop CPU od Ryzen 3 3100. Zato smo također testirali njegove performanse u igrama. Kako bismo se držali podalje od mogućih uskih grla, postavili smo igre da koriste 1080p rezolucije i najniže postavke kvalitete grafike.

U Shadow of the Tomb^{(Shadow of the Tomb Raider)} Raideru , AMD Ryzen 3 3300X dobio je rezultat CPU renderiranja^{(CPU Render)} od 162 sličica u sekundi. To je 15,2% manje fps-a nego kod Ryzen 3 3300X i 28,7% manje od fps-a koje je prikazao Ryzen 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600.

U Metro Exodusu^{(Metro Exodus)} , jednoj od najzahtjevnijih igara koje smo igrali, iu pogledu video i procesorskih performansi, AMD Ryzen 3 3100 isporučio je prosječnu brzinu kadrova od 105 (3,7% manje od Ryzena 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3300X ili Ryzena 5^{(Ryzen 5)} 3600 ).

U World War Z , igrici optimiziranoj za multi-threading, izmjerili smo 155 fps. To je 11,4% manje od onoga što smo dobili na AMD Ryzen 3 3300X i 20,5% manje sličica u sekundi u odnosu na AMD Ryzen 5 3600.

Kako bismo testirali temperature, pokrenuli smo Prime95 da optereti CPU , dok smo ga pratili s Open Hardware Monitorom^{(Open Hardware Monitor)} . Dobra vijest je da se, čak i na ovom zahtjevnom testu, AMD Ryzen 3 3100 nije zagrijao više od maksimalno 76 stupnjeva Celzija^(Celsius) .

Imajte^(Please) na umu da smo primili uzorke Ryzen 3^{(Ryzen 3)} 3100 i Ryzen 3 3300X bez njihovih standardnih hladnjaka. Stoga smo morali koristiti još jedan hladnjak: ASUS ROG Ryuo 120 .

Konačno, izmjerili smo i potrošnju energije AMD Ryzen 3 3100. U našim je testovima Open Hardware Monitor izvijestio da mu je potrebno najviše 60 vata. To je mala vrijednost koja vas može usrećiti samo ako namjeravate izraditi energetski učinkovito računalo.

Sva mjerila vode do istog zaključka: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 je izvrstan desktop CPU. Čak i uz pristupačnu cijenu, ovaj procesor ne pravi kompromise kada su performanse u pitanju. Trebao bi dobro raditi bez obzira na to koristite li ga za uredski rad, pregledavanje weba ili igranje početnih igrica.^{(All the benchmarks lead to the same conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is an excellent desktop CPU. Even with an affordable price tag, this processor does not compromise when it comes to performance. It should do a good job regardless of whether you use it for office work, web browsing, or entry-level gaming.)}

Kakvo je vaše mišljenje o AMD Ryzen 3 3100 procesoru?

Sada znate više o najpristupačnijem desktop procesoru iz AMD Ryzen 3 000 serije. Vidjeti da početni CPU nudi ovolike performanse je nešto što nas može samo usrećiti. Slažeš li se? Podijelite^(Share) svoje mišljenje o AMD Ryzen 3 3100 u komentarima u nastavku i razgovarajmo.

Review AMD Ryzen 3 3100: Redefining budget-friendly

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is the most budget-friendly deѕktop processor from the Rуzen 3000 family. It costs under 100 dollars, it has some surprising specs, and it supports future-proof technоlogies like PCI Express version 4. While testing it, we noticed that іt sometimes outpеrforms some of the more expensive рrocessors from thе Intel Core i5 family. If you are curious to learn more, read thіѕ reνiew and find out more about what less than a hundred dollars can get you these daуs:

AMD Ryzen 3 3100: Who is it good for?

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is an excellent processor for those of you who want:

• To build a budget-friendly desktop computer
• Good performance in productivity apps
• To aim for an energy-efficient PC

See price on:

Buy now

Pros and cons

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has the following strengths:

• Low price tag
• The base frequency and boost clocks are excellent
• Fast in productivity apps and web browsing
• Good-enough performance for entry-level gaming
• Low power consumption and temperatures
• Support for fast PCIe 4.0 components such as SSDs
• The Zen 2 architecture means that you can pair it with high-speed DDR4
• It is unlocked, so overclocking might be something worth looking into

There are some downsides too:

• It is a bit underpowered if you want to run games at high quality
• For only 20 USD more, you can get the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, which is an even better desktop processor

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is a great choice if what you're looking for is good performance on a budget. Even though it costs less than 100 dollars, it is nothing short of impressive in benchmarks, productivity tasks, and entry-level gaming. The Ryzen 3 3100 should outperform any previous generation Intel Core i3 processor. In some benchmarks, it manages to outperform even an Intel Core i5-8400 which retails at a significantly higher price. However, if you don't mind paying 20 dollars more, the Ryzen 3 3300X is an even better choice that delivers a meaningful boost, especially in games.

Hardware specifications

The Ryzen 3 3100 is the most entry-level processor from AMD's 3000 processors series, but that doesn't mean it is not packed with goodies. First of all, it's built using the same Zen 2 architecture as AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, Ryzen 5 3600, or Ryzen 7 3700X, and the same 7-nanometer manufacturing process. More importantly, it supports PCI Express 4.0. If you want to know why this matters, read: PCI Express 4 vs PCIe 3: Is there a performance improvement?

AMD Ryzen 3 3100 has four physical cores and eight threads, running at a base frequency of 3.6 GHz. It can reach a boost clock of 3.9 GHz on a single thread. AMD equipped this processor with a total cache of 18 MB, of which 16 MB is Level 3 cache. Also, it uses the AM4 socket, which makes it compatible with the new B550 chipset motherboards that come with PCIe 4 and a lower price than the ones based on the existing X570 chipset. It is also compatible with AMD's PCIe 3 chipsets found on B450, X470, and X370 motherboards.

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 supports fast DDR4 RAM running at 3200 MHz, but you can also use DIMMs with even faster clock rates. While the TDP is not a measurement for power consumption, it can be used to get a quick view of how much electricity a processor needs in normal use. On that note, the TDP of the Ryzen 3 3100 is only 65 Watts, so it should be an excellent choice if you're looking to build an energy-efficient PC.

At just under 100 USD, the Ryzen 3 3100 comes with impressive specifications that probably make Intel envious. This entry-level processor gives you four cores, eight threads, and PCIe 4 support. This is more than we would have expected for such a low price.

Performance in benchmarks and games

We tested the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 processor on a PC with the following hardware and software:

• Motherboard: ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero (Wi-Fi)
• Memory: HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB Memory (2 x 8GB, 3200MHz)
• Graphics Card: ASUS ROG STRIX GTX 1660 Ti GAMING OC
• Storage: ADATA XPG Gammix S11 Pro SSD
• Monitor: ASUS ROG Strix XG32VQ Curved Gaming Monitor (32-inch WQHD 2560 x 1440, 144Hz)
• Power Supply Unit: ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum
• Operating System: Windows 10 Pro x64 with November 2019 Update

For a better understanding of how fast and reliable the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 processor is, we ran a series of benchmarks. Then, we compared its results with those we got with other CPUs: Ryzen 3 3300X (its faster brother with four cores) and Ryzen 5 3600 (the most affordable 6-core AMD 3000-series CPU).

We started with CPU-Z's Single Thread test. The Ryzen 3 3100 scored 458 points, which is an excellent result (6.5% less than 3300X and 2.5% less than Ryzen 5 3600 ). According to CPU-Z's rankings, the Ryzen 3 3100 is faster than a 6-core Intel Core i5-8400, which retails at almost double the price.

In the Multi-Thread test, Ryzen 3 3100 scored 2535 points. It is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 3300X (by 6.1%), and significantly less proficient than the Ryzen 5 3600 (by 30.1%). Still, it performs the same as an Intel Core i5-8400 (a desktop CPU with two cores more and almost twice the price).

In Cinebench R20, a multi-thread rendering test, AMD Ryzen 3 3100 got 2169 points. It's a bit slower than the 3300X (7.9%), and notably less powerful than a 6-core Ryzen 5 3600 (32.7% slower).

In Blender Benchmark, we rendered the bmw27 and classroom scenes. This benchmark counts the rendering time. The less time needed, the better. Here too, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is noticeably slower than the other CPUs in our list, even compared to the Ryzen 3 3300X (11% weaker than the 3300X, and 15.6% slower than a Ryzen 5 3600).

We also used 7-Zip to measure multi-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 managed to reach a speed of 26 MB/s in the compression benchmark, which is a bit (10.3%) less than what the Ryzen 3 3300X can do. Compared to Ryzen 5 3600, the difference in speed is significant (35%).

As for the decompression speed, the Ryzen 3 3100 was not that far behind the Ryzen 3 3300X. Still, the two additional cores on the Ryzen 5 3600 show their prowess.

To test the processor in typical daily activities, such as web browsing, video conferencing, apps start-up times, productivity, and digital content creation, we used PCMark 10, and the Ryzen 3 3100 did not disappoint. Even though it has two fewer cores, it proved to be almost as fast as the Ryzen 5 3600 (only a 1.4% score difference). Compared to the Ryzen 3 3300X, it got a tad lower result (5.8% lower score), but hey, the four-cored 3300X had an unexpectedly high score in PCMark 10.

To measure this processor's performance when browsing the web, we used the JetStream 2 benchmark in Google Chrome. AMD Ryzen 3 3100 got a good score, although it can't match the Ryzen 3 3300X (10.8% better) or the Ryzen 5 3600 (8.8% better).

The AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is probably not the processor you're considering if you are a gamer. However, some people might want to build a budget-friendly PC, and you can't get a lower price for an AMD Zen 2 desktop CPU than the Ryzen 3 3100. That is why we also tested its gaming performance. To keep away from any possible bottlenecks, we've set the games to use 1080p resolutions and the lowest graphics quality settings.

In Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X got a CPU Render score of 162 frames per second. That's 15.2% fewer fps than from a Ryzen 3 3300X, and 28.7% fewer than the fps rendered by a Ryzen 5 3600.

In Metro Exodus, which is one of the most demanding games we've played, both in terms of video and processor performance, AMD Ryzen 3 3100 delivered an average frame rate of 105 (3.7% less than a Ryzen 3 3300X or Ryzen 5 3600).

In World War Z, which is a game optimized for multi-threading, we measured 155 fps. It's 11.4% less than what we got on the AMD Ryzen 3 3300X, and 20.5% fewer frames per second compared to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600.

To test the temperatures, we ran Prime95 to stress the CPU, while monitoring it with Open Hardware Monitor. The good news is that, even in this demanding test, the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 did not heat more than a maximum of 76 degrees Celsius.

Please note that we received the Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen 3 3300X samples without their stock coolers. Therefore we had to use another cooler: an ASUS ROG Ryuo 120.

Finally, we also measured the power consumption of the AMD Ryzen 3 3100. In our tests, Open Hardware Monitor reported that it needs a maximum of 60 watts. It is a small value that can only make you happy if you're aiming to build an energy-efficient computer.

All the benchmarks lead to the same conclusion: the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 is an excellent desktop CPU. Even with an affordable price tag, this processor does not compromise when it comes to performance. It should do a good job regardless of whether you use it for office work, web browsing, or entry-level gaming.

What is your opinion about the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 processor?

Now you know more about the most affordable desktop processor from the AMD Ryzen 3000-series. Seeing that an entry-level CPU offers this much performance is something that can only make us happy. Do you agree? Share your opinion about the AMD Ryzen 3 3100 in the comments below, and let's discuss.

Related posts

• Recenzija AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: Novi kralj proračunskih igara!

• AMD Zen 3 i Ryzen 5000 procesori dolaze (specifikacije, cijene, datum izlaska)

• Recenzija procesora AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: najbolji izbor srednje klase za 2019.!

• Usporedba performansi: Korištenje AMD Ryzen 5 3600X na matičnim pločama X570 u odnosu na X470

• Recenzija procesora AMD Ryzen 5 3600: Najbolji omjer cijene i performansi!

• Recenzija ASUS Chromebox 3: OS Chrome je brz na mini računalu s puno opcija

• Pregledajte performanse Logitech MK850: Kvalitetne periferne uređaje za više uređaja!

• AMD Ryzen 5 5600X overclockan na 4,8 GHz: isplati li se? -

• Recenzija procesora AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: odlično za igranje!

• Pregledajte Kingston DataTraveler Elite G2: izdržljivi USB 3.1 flash pogon!

• AMD naspram INTEL-a 2022.: Koji su CPU-ovi bolji?

• Pregledajte ASUS ROG Thor 850W Platinum: Pogledajte svoju potrošnju energije u stvarnom vremenu!

• Sony HD-S1A - Pregled najtanjeg vanjskog tvrdog diska koji danas možete kupiti!

• Pregledajte Intel Core i5-10600K: Izvanredan procesor srednjeg ranga!

• Pregled Kingston KC1000 NVMe SSD: Nadogradite svoju pohranu s izvrsnim performansama!

• AMD Ryzen 9 5900X recenzija: Najbolji procesor za igre na svijetu? -

• Pregled ADATA XPG SPECTRIX D60G DDR4 RGB memorijskih modula

• Recenzija Kingstona A400: SSD pohrana uz proračun!

• ASUS ROG Maximus Z690 Extreme recenzija: Zaista vrhunska matična ploča

• Pregled monitora ViewSonic VP2756-4K: Izvrsna kvaliteta slike po razumnoj cijeni