Najveće rivalstvo na tržištu CPU -a je desetljećima dug rat između Intela^(Intel) i AMD- a, a iz naše perspektive, ova bi se bitka mogla potrajati još 10 godina ili više jer računalno tržište zahtijeva brže procesore. Vrlo je važno i za kućne i za poslovne korisnike računala da imaju dovoljno brz procesor jer je mozak taj koji sve pokreće. Bez CPU -a , vaše je računalo samo beskorisna ljuska i nitko ne želi da to leži uokolo.

Intel protiv AMD-a

Oba diva u obliku AMD- a i Intela^(Intel) , već se jako dugo natječu na najvišoj razini, pa, koji je bolji od drugog? Ovaj post općenito uspoređuje Intel CPU s AMD procesorima za performanse, igranje igara, overclocking, cijene itd.

Trebamo istaknuti da i AMD i Intel rade na istoj arhitekturi x86 , zbog čega sve vaše Windows 10 aplikacije imaju tendenciju da rade isto bez obzira koji je brendirani procesor unutar sustava.

Za one koji se pitaju, AMD može stvoriti x86 čipove uglavnom zbog prethodnog sporazuma o razmjeni tehnologije s Intelom^(Intel) . U to vrijeme, AMD je bio samo drugi dobavljač za Intel , ali stvari su se promijenile 1991. godine kada je tvrtka odlučila stvoriti vlastite čipove bazirane na x86 platformi i izravno se natjecati sa svojim bivšim partnerom. Procesor se zvao Am386 i bio je klon Intela 80386^{(Intel 80386)} . AMD nije imao veliki uspjeh s tim procesorom, ali kao što možemo reći, tvrtka je išla vrlo dobro za sebe tijekom desetljeća.

Izvođenje^{(Performance)}

Kada kupujete novi mikroprocesor, performanse bi trebale biti jedna od prvih stvari koje vam padaju na pamet. Prvo^(First) , trebate odrediti za što vam je potrebna izvedba. Je li za posao, igranje ili pomalo za oboje?

Sada, ako želite igrati, ali imate ograničen budžet, velike su šanse da bi bilo preskupo kupiti procesor zajedno s namjenskim GPU -om . Da, nekoliko procesora temeljenih na Intelu dolazi s diskretnom grafikom, ali oni uopće nisu dovoljno snažni za igranje igara.

Ljudi u AMD- u odlučili su promijeniti cijelu igru ​​lansiranjem Ryzen 5 2400G. Dolazi s diskretnom Vega 11 grafičkom izvedbom.

Kako sada stoji, igrač s niskim proračunom trebao bi razmisliti o ulaganju u AMD proizvod jer oni daju najbolji omjer performansi i cijene.

Za one koji si mogu priuštiti tehnologiju s najviše performansi, Intel je u tom pogledu na vrhu. Ipak, AMD donosi bolje performanse u više niti zbog više jezgri i broja niti.

Ako pogledamo Intel Core i9 i AMD Threadripper , koji su najbolji potrošački čipovi obje tvrtke, jasno je da su oba kvalitetna, ali Intel ima prednost kada je riječ o sirovim performansama.

Overclocking procesora^{(CPU Overclocking)}

Tu stvari postaju zanimljive, posebno u korist Intela, a tako je već dugi niz godina. Vidite, ako želite dobiti najbolju izvedbu overclockinga od procesora vašeg računala, onda je Intel vaš najbolji izbor.

Vjerujemo da to ima sve veze s Intelovom sofisticiranijom tehnologijom hyperthreading i turbo-boost. AMD ne zaostaje, naravno, posebno s Ryzenom^(Ryzen) , ali lopta je u ovom trenutku još uvijek u Intelovom polju.

Tko ima bolju grafičku karticu?^{(Who has the better graphics card?)}

Lako je odgovoriti na to pitanje budući da AMD ima nekoliko namjenskih grafičkih kartica na tržištu, a Intel ne. Vrlo je važno istaknuti da je AMD , da bi došao do ove razine, u prošlosti morao kupiti ATI , gdje ^(ATI)Intel pokušava doći sam.

Tijekom godina čuli smo glasine da će Intel kupiti NVIDIA , ali ništa od toga se od tada nije materijaliziralo i sumnjamo da će se to ikada dogoditi. Sada, tvrtka dočarava svoju liniju namjenskih kartica, ali nismo potpuno sigurni kada će se one pojaviti na tržištu.

Intel kaže da planira izdanje za 2020. godinu, dakle za godinu dana. Nismo sigurni koliko dobro napreduje Intelova^(Intel) tehnologija namjenske grafičke kartice i hoće li imati performanse potrebne da bi NVIDIA i AMD mogli istrčati svoj novac.

Jedno je sigurno; Intel će ove namjenske ^(Intel)GPU-^(GPUs) ove morati prodati po cijeni koja je jeftinija od konkurenata ako želi privući vrlo lojalne igrače.

Dakle, kako stoji, Intel je dosta zaostao, a to je vidljivo jer je tvrtka odlučila koristiti AMD-ove grafičke kartice sa svojim vrhunskim mobilnim procesorima H-serije. Naravno, ovo neće biti zauvijek, ali za sada je to dobra stvar jer će potrošači vjerojatno vidjeti porast tanjih laptopa za igre.

Razumijemo da je to moguće zahvaljujući korištenju Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge ( EMIB ), ali budući da se nijedan od ovih uređaja s Intelovim pogonom još nije pojavio na tržištu, teško je reći kako bi se slagali s sličan AMD postavljen.

AMD ili Intel za igranje^{(AMD or Intel for Gaming)}

Što se tiče toga koji je procesor bolji za igranje, pa, sve je subjektivno. Međutim, Intelovi^(Intel) procesori su dobro dizajnirani imajući na umu igranje i to se vidi u ukupnoj izvedbi.

AMD , s druge strane, definitivno nije pokleknut, pogotovo sada s Ryzeom^(Ryze) u igri. Međutim, mnoge su igre optimizirane da izvuku maksimum iz Intelovih procesora^{(Intel CPUs)} , što je glavni razlog zašto Intel trenutno ima prednost.

U isto vrijeme, AMD je kralj kada su u pitanju igraće konzole. I Xbox One i PlayStation 4 pokreće AMD , a za to je zaslužan APU^(APU) ( Ubrzana procesorska jedinica^{(Accelerated Processing Unit)} ) tvrtke.

Određivanje cijene^(Pricing)

Ovo je jedno od područja u kojima se i AMD i Intel razlikuju, a čak i sada se ništa bitno nije promijenilo. Vidite, Intel je oduvijek bio poznat kao tvrtka koja stvara vrhunske procesore, i to s pravom.

Intel je jako dugo stajao na vrhu s najboljim procesorima za rad i igranje. AMD , naravno, nije značajno zaostajao, ali tvrtka ima tendenciju da ne ispuni obećanja kada je riječ o performansama.

Zbog toga su cijene uvijek bile u korist AMD -a. ^(AMD)Međutim, stvari su se jako promijenile od lansiranja Bulldozer serije CPU-^(CPUs) a . Godine 2017. AMD je lansirao Ryzen ; pogodi što? To je najbolja obitelj procesora koju je tvrtka ikada osmislila.

Ne samo da su brzi, već su i jeftiniji od onoga što Intel nudi. Konačno^(Finally) , Intel dobiva dugotrajnu i potrebnu konkurenciju, a to je dobro za potrošače.

Najbolji udarac za svoj novac^{(Best bang for your buck)}

Tijekom svakodnevnih rutina, dva slična AMD i Intel procesora vrhunskog kvaliteta neće raditi radikalno različito jedan od drugog. Međutim, ako igrate igrice ili planirate uređivati ​​videozapise, tada biste trebali duboko razmotriti koje postavke procesora trebate odabrati.

Za igranje igara s namjenskom grafičkom karticom, svaki dan bismo preuzeli Intel nad AMD-om^(AMD) , ali kada je u pitanju teško uređivanje videa i korištenje aplikacija koje zahtijevaju tešku višenitnost, AMD čip bi mogao biti najbolji izbor zbog više jezgri. .

S naše točke gledišta, AMD nastoji ponuditi bolje performanse i cijene putem srednjeg i nižeg spektra tržišta, a to uključuje igranje igara.

Ako nemate puno novca za potrošiti, onda AMD -ova postavka ima puno smisla, ali ako imate novca za bacanje, pogledajte što Intel ima za ponuditi i ostavite svoje prijatelje u čudu impresivnim računalom izvođenje.

Vaše mišljenje?^{(Your take?)}

AMD vs Intel - What are the main differences?

The biggest rivalry in the CPU market is the decades-long war between Intel and AMD, and from our perspective, this battle could go on for another 10 years or more as the computing market requires faster processors. It’s very important for both home and business computer users to have a fast-enough processor because it’s the brain that keeps everything moving. Without a CPU, your computer is just a useless shell, and no one wants that lying around.

Intel vs AMD

Both giants in the form of AMD and Intel, have been competing at the highest level for a very long time, so, which one is better than the other? This post broadly compares Intel CPU with AMD processors for performance, gaming, overclocking, pricing, etc.

We should point out that both AMD and Intel work on the same x86 architecture, which is why all your Windows 10 apps tend to work the same no matter which branded processor is inside the system.

For those who are wondering, AMD can create x86 chips mainly due to a past technology exchange agreement with Intel. At the time, AMD was merely a second-source supplier for Intel, but things changed in 1991 when the company decided to create its own chips based on the x86 platform and compete directly with its former partner. The processor was called the Am386, and it was a clone of the Intel 80386. AMD didn’t have a huge success with that processor, but as we can tell, the company went on to do very well for itself over the decades.

Performance

When purchasing a new microprocessor, performance should be one of the first things that come to mind. First, you should determine what you need the performance for. Is it for work, gaming, or a little bit of both?

Now, if you want to game but you’re on a budget, then chances are it would be too expensive to purchase a processor along with a dedicated GPU. Yes, several Intel-based processors come with discrete graphics, but these aren’t powerful enough for gaming at all.

The folks at AMD decided to change the entire game with the launch of the Ryzen 5 2400G. It comes packed with a discrete Vega 11 graphics performance.

As it stands, then, a low budget gamer should consider investing in an AMD product because they give the best performance to price ratio.

For those who can afford the tech with the most performance, then Intel comes out on top in this regard. Still, AMD brings to the table better multi-threading performance due to more cores and thread count.

If we look at the Intel Core i9 and the AMD Threadripper, which are the top consumer chips from both companies, it’ clear that both are quality, but the Intel has the edge where raw performance is concerned.

CPU Overclocking

This is where things get interesting, especially in Intel’s favor, and this has been the case for many years. You see, if you’re looking to get the best overclocking performance from your computer processor, then Intel is your best bet.

We believe it has everything to do with Intel’s more sophisticated hyperthreading and turbo-boost technology. AMD isn’t far behind, of course, especially with Ryzen, but the ball is still in Intel’s court at this time.

Who has the better graphics card?

It’s easy to answer that question since AMD has several dedicated graphics cards on the market and Intel does not. It’s very important to point out that to get to this level, AMD had to acquire ATI in the past, where Intel is trying to get there on its own.

Over the years, we’ve heard rumors of Intel acquiring NVIDIA, but nothing of the sort has since materialized, and we doubt it’ll ever happen. Now, the company is conjuring up its line of dedicated cards, but we’re not fully certain when these will hit the market.

Intel says it’s planning for 2020 release, so that’s a year from now. We’re not sure how well Intel’s dedicated graphics card technology is coming along and whether or not it’ll have the performance needed to give NVIDIA and AMD a run for their money.

One thing is for certain; Intel will have to sell these dedicated GPUs at a price that is cheaper than rivals if they want to attract gamers who are very loyal.

So, as it stands, Intel is well behind, and it shows because the company has decided to use AMD’s graphics cards with its high-end H-Series mobile processors. Certainly, this won’t be forever, but for now, it’s a good thing because consumers will likely see the rise of thinner gaming laptops.

We understand that this is made possible due to the use of Embedded Multi-Die Interconnect Bridge (EMIB), but since none of these Intel-powered devices have hit the market as of yet, it’s difficult to tell how they would stack up against a similar AMD set up.

AMD or Intel for Gaming

In terms of which processor is better for gaming, well, it’s all subjective. However, the Intel processors have been well designed with gaming in mind, and it shows in the overall performance.

AMD, on the other hand, is definitely no slouch, especially now with Ryze in play. However, many games have been optimized to get the most out of Intel CPUs, which is the main reason why Intel has the edge right now.

At the same time, AMD is the king where gaming consoles are concerned. Both the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 are powered by AMD, and that’s due to the company’s APU (Accelerated Processing Unit).

Pricing

This is one of the areas both AMD, and Intel differ, and even now, nothing much has changed. You see, Intel has always been known as the company that creates premium processors, and rightfully so.

For a very long time, Intel stood at the top with the best processors for work and gaming. AMD wasn’t significantly behind, of course, but the company tends to fail at delivering on promises made when it comes down to performance.

Because of this, then, pricing has always been in AMD’s favor. However, things have changed a great deal since the launch of the Bulldozer series of CPUs. In the year 2017, AMD launched Ryzen; an guess what? It’s the best family of processors the company has ever come up with.

Not only are they fast, but still cheaper than what Intel has to offer. Finally, Intel is getting some long and needed competition, and that bodes well for consumers.

Best bang for your buck

During daily routines, two similar AMD and Intel processors from the top-end won’t perform radically different from one another. However, if you’re gaming or planning to edit videos, then that’s where you should take deep consideration into which processor setup you should go with.

For gaming with a dedicated graphics card, we’d take Intel over AMD any day, but when it comes down to heavy video editing and the use f applications that require heavy multithreading, an AMD chip could be the best choice due to having more cores.

From our point of view, AMD tends to offer better performance to price ratio via the mid and low-end spectrum of the market, and that does include gaming.

If you do not have a lot of money to spend, then an AMD setup makes a lot of sense, but if you have the cash to throw around, then look to what Intel has to offer and leave your friends in awe with your computer’s impressive performance.

Your take?

Related posts

• Program za deinstalaciju upravljačkih programa zaslona za upravljačke programe AMD, INTEL, NVIDIA

• AMD naspram INTEL-a 2022.: Koji su CPU-ovi bolji?

• Trebate li kupiti nove AMD Ryzen 3000 CPU ili se zadržati na Intelu?

• Kako omogućiti virtualizaciju u BIOS-u za Intel i AMD

• Popravi Windows ne može pronaći pogrešku Bin64InstallManagerApp.exe

• Utjecaj na performanse Precision Boosta za AMD Ryzen procesore

• AMD Catalyst Control Center ne može se pokrenuti; Kako ga otvoriti?

• Overclocking AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Što dobivate, a što gubite? -

• Pregled procesora AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

• Koja je najbolja matična ploča za vaš AMD Ryzen CPU?

• Što je Hyperthreading u CPU-u i kako funkcionira?

• Recenzija AMD Ryzen 3 3300X: Novi kralj proračunskih igara!

• Popravite nedostatak AMD Catalyst Control Center

• Povećavaju li AMD-ov PBO (Precision Boost Overdrive) i AutoOC (Auto OverClocking) performanse?

• Softver Intel Thunderbolt Dock ne radi u sustavu Windows 11/10

• Što je atiesrxx.exe u upravitelju zadataka sustava Windows 10?

• AMD Zen 3 i Ryzen 5000 procesori dolaze (specifikacije, cijene, datum izlaska)

• Skinny na AMD Ryzen 3000

• AMD-ovi prioriteti u 2021.: Intervju s Rogerom Bensonom -

• AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT recenzija: Izvrstan za igranje od 1440p! -